Microscopic Cyst Resection for the Treatment of Patients Diagnosed with Epididymal Cyst.

Epididymal cysts mostly occur in men aged 20-40 years old. Previous reports have covered concerns about postoperative complexes, including postoperative asoedema, hematoma, sustaining pain, and seminal tract obstruction in patients who have undertaken nonmicroscopic epididymal cyst resection or epididymal resection. Nonmicroscopic epididymal cyst surgery is suggested for patients with childbirth plans as a precaution. The treatment of male epididymal cysts via microtechnology is obviously a beneficial option; we took the lead in carrying out microscopic epididymal exploration and cyst resection surgery in China. From September 2017 to April 2021, 41 young and middle-aged male patients diagnosed with epididymal cysts underwent microtechnology treatment in a program titled "microscopic epididymal exploration and cystectomy". The postoperative follow-up lasted for 3-50 months. The results confirmed that, as microscopic manipulation largely improved visualization of the subtle tissue structures of the epididymis, the cyst could be clearly dissected apart and completely removed intact under the microscope. Bleeding during the operation was significantly reduced (2-3 mL) and wound drainage was not required. According to follow-up data, microscopic treatment significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative scrotal hematoma, edema, and long-term postoperative pain, thereby promising a higher surgical success rate as well as recurrence prevention. Besides, preliminary experience and reflection suggest that microscopic epididymal exploration and cystectomy provide efficient preservation of the epididymal patency through refined treatment, while a better prognosis can be achieved. We recommend that surgery be carried out before the epididymal cyst develops to 0.8 cm in diameter, for fear that a larger epididymal cyst (>0.9 cm in diameter) could cause the complete destruction of all tubules of the ipsilateral epididymis - a more severe case with damage to the testicular output network.

Symptomatic Intraparenchymal Epididymal Cysts: Description of 11 cases.

Epididymal cysts are benign cystic formations of the epididymis that usually appear in adolescence or early adulthood. Their frequency doubles after the age of 14-15. Obstruction in the epididymal efferent ductules with subsequent prostenotic dilatation of them, as well as dysgenesis due to hormonal disorders during fetal or postnatal life, are possible. At the 1st Department of Pediatric Surgery of A.U.Th. we treated 11 cases of boys at the age of 11-16 who presented with acute scrotum because of an epididymal cyst. The diagnosis was confirmed by ultrasound scanning . Due to persistent symptomatology, patients underwent surgical exploration and removal of the cyst. The postoperative care of the patients was uncomplicated with immediate remission of symptoms. In one case, ipsilateral acute epididymitis occurred after 10 days, which was successfully treated with antibiotic therapy. It is reported that approximately 50% of epididymal cysts involute within an average of 17 months. In conclusion, using the data obtained from the review, of the small in number of international bibliography studies, it is proposed conservative treatment of asymptomatic cysts with diameter smaller than 1 cm and surgical excision [1] of large asymptomatic cysts with diameter greater than 1 cm, which do not regress after a follow-up of 24-48 months, cysts, regardless of their diameter, responsible for persistent symptoms and in the manifestation of acute scrotal symptoms due to inflammation, intravesical bleeding or secondarily torsion of the epididymis.

Aspiration and Sclerotherapy: A Minimally Invasive Treatment for Hydroceles and Spermatoceles.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our contemporary experience with aspiration and sclerotherapy (AS) as a non-surgical alternative for patients with symptomatic hydrocele and spermatocele who prefer non-surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were identified by billing diagnosis code for hydrocele or spermatocele from 2015 to 2019. Patients underwent AS with doxycycline (200-400 mg). Physical examination, ultrasound and aspirate microscopy were used to differentiate hydrocele from spermatocele. Baseline and follow-up data were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 65 patients underwent AS, 54/65 (83%) for hydrocele and 11/65 (17%) for spermatocele with mean aspirate volumes 307 mL (SD 238 mL) and 138 mL (SD 112 mL), respectively. Follow-up data was available for 38/54 (70%) hydroceles and 8/11 (73%) spermatoceles with median follow-up 28 (IQR 23-41) and 22 (IQR 18.5-30.5) months respectively. Relief of patient reported bother associated with scrotal size occurred in 29/38 (77%) hydroceles and 8/9 (89%) spermatoceles. 2/54 (4%) hydrocele patients developed hematoma managed with in-office aspiration. Immediate post-procedural pain occurred in 2/56 (4%) hydroceles and 2/10 (20%) spermatocele. Post-procedural pain requiring more than 5 tablets of hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5mg/325mg occurred in 2/57 (3%) hydroceles and 2/10 (20%) spermatoceles. Surgical repair was ultimately pursued in 3/38 (8%) and 1/9 (11%) patients with persistent hydrocele and spermatocele respectively. CONCLUSION: AS is a safe and effective treatment alternative for hydrocele and spermatocele for patients wishing to avoid surgery.

Epididymal cyst in children.

The terms "epididymal cyst" and "spermatocele" are commonly used to describe the same entity, but, conversely, they are slightly different. Epididymal cyst is a benign mass, and it is more common than previously thought in prepubertal age. Pathogenic mechanisms for epididymal cyst have not been fully clarified yet, even if epididymal cysts have been reported in association with other malformations of the urinary tract or complex syndromes. Epididymal cyst is easily characterized and differentiated from spermatocele using ultrasound imaging. Conservative management constitutes the treatment of choice in the majority of cases, and surgery is recommended only in selected cases. Conclusion: To date, a review on epididymal cyst in childhood is lacking in the literature. Herein, an overview of knowledge about epididymal cyst in children has been carried out with particular attention to differential diagnosis, proper management, and practice guidelines for caregivers of children who may present with an epididymal cyst. What is Known: • Epididymal cyst is a benign sac in the testicles which is usually asymptomatic. • Epididymal cyst is easily diagnosed by ultrasound scans, and it is considered a self-limiting disease in the majority of cases. What is New: • Insight on differential diagnosis between epididymal cyst and spermatocele. • Valuable knowledge on the best management strategy for epididymal cyst and on practice guidelines for parents of children presenting with epididymal cyst.

Complications after scrotal surgery - still a major issue?

OBJECTIVE: Gold standard treatment of symptomatic hydrocele or spermatocele is surgery. Despite a minor procedure, complications such as bleeding and infections leading to reoperations may be devastating for the patients. In autumn 2018, an accumulation of complications was seen in our department. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate and grade of complications and to identify potential means to reduce these. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient records of all patients undergoing surgical repair of hydrocele or spermatocele from December 2017 to November 2018 were examined. Results were audited to identify potential causes of complications. The focus was on the perioperative hemostasis and postoperative activity restrictions. The outcome was compared to a consecutive patient series operated the following year. RESULTS: Sixty-five men were operated on during the first period. Twenty-two patients contacted the department postoperatively due to swelling or pain, 19 patients were examined at the hospital and six patients were re-operated 1-9 times. The following year, 69 patients were operated on. Of these, 16 patients contacted the department postoperatively (p = 0.17), 13 patients were examined at the hospital, and five patients were re-operated (p = 0.68). There was the same complication rate in patients operated by specialist urologists or supervised younger doctors. However, patients preoperatively examined and informed by a specialized urologist had significantly fewer complications compared to those informed by urological residents and interns (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Despite the change in patient information and increased awareness of possible complications, a high proportion of patients still were in need of unplanned contact to the department and reoperation.

Fine needle aspiration cytology of epididymal nodules and its corroboration with ultrasonographic-histological findings.

BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) assisted with scrotal ultrasonography is the best preoperative diagnostic modality for palpable epididymal nodules. It also aids in their successive remedial approach as well as serves semi-therapeutically in cystic lesions. The objectives of this study are to recognize the spectrum of pathological conditions giving rise to epididymal nodules, then to compare them with corresponding ultrasound images, and to evaluate the histological features wherever practicable. METHODS: Total 62 patients underwent FNAC as well as sonographic evaluation for their epididymal nodules. Histopathology was performed in only 20 cases. RESULTS: Epididymitis either caused by tuberculosis (30.6%), or in its acute (11.3%) and chronic (8.1%) forms remained the commonest cytological diagnosis. Neoplastic lesions included mostly adenomatoid tumors (8.1%), and another case of seminomatous spread from ipsilateral testicular primary. Nineteen of the excised masses corroborated with their respective cytodiagnoses. The discrepant lesion was actually a papillary cystadenoma, which was cytologically misinterpreted as adenomatoid tumor. CONCLUSIONS: FNAC becomes the first-hand investigative measure for epididymal nodules, by virtue of its early, easy and highly accurate diagnostic implications. It segregates the patients into proper therapeutic protocol and thereby estranges those who really need operative management. When deployed together with ultrasound, the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC improves further.

Torsión simultánea de epidídimo y quiste epididimario / Simultaneous torsion of epididymis and an epididymal cyst

No disponible

A rare cause of acute scrotum in a child: torsion of an epididymal cyst. Case report and review of the literature.

Torsion of an epididymal cyst is an extremely rare cause of acute scrotum in children and in young boys. Its reported incidence is 5-20%. The treatment is usually conservative. Many cases (up to 60%) regress spontaneously, especially if below 3 cm. Few cases have been reported in Literature (7 cases/2018). We add our patient as eighth case. He was a 13-year-old boy who was admitted for acute scrotum. Ultrasound excluded torsion of the testis and he was managed for 5 day conservatively. Based on clinical history and physical exam, we decided to perform a prompt surgery that revealed a torsion of epididymal cyst that was confirmed by histological exam.

Epidemiology of hydrocele and spermatocele; incidence, treatment and complications.

Objectives: To estimate the incidence of men seeking specialized care and receiving treatment for hydro or spermatocele complaints. Also, to determine the risk of complications of treatment. Materials and methods: The total number of men living in Sweden each year from 2005 to 2014 was used to calculate incidence and age distribution of adult (≥18 years) men seeking specialized healthcare with either hydro or spermatocele. This was done by using nationwide registries, mandatory by law. They contain information on primary or discharge diagnosis, procedure codes and antibiotic prescriptions. Also, complication rates comparing aspiration (with or without sclerotherapy) and conventional surgery were analysed. Results: The incidence of men with either hydro or spermatocele diagnosis in specialized healthcare was ∼100/100,000 men. The treatment incidence was 17/100,000 men. Orchiectomy was used as primary treatment in 2.4% of cases. The risk of experiencing a complication was clinically and statistically significantly increased with conventional surgery as compared with aspiration, 17.5% (1607/9174) vs 4.6% (181/3920), corresponding to relative risk of 3.79 (95% CI = 3.27-4.40). Hematoma and infections were the most common complications. Conclusion: Hydro and spermatoceles are common, affecting elderly men. Aspiration seems advantageous with respect to complications and can be recommended due to the benign course of the disease. The indication for conventional surgery might be questioned such as the use of orchiectomy as primary treatment.

Epididymal Dirofilariasis in a Child: First Case Report from Bulgaria.

OBJECTIVE: To present case of a child with epididymal dirofil-ariasis. CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND INTERVENTION: An 11-year-old boy was admitted to the Clinic of Pediatric Urology for elective surgery treatment of epididymal cyst on the left side. After removal, the cyst was sent for histological examination. Microscopic examination of the histological slides revealed cross-sections of a nematode belonging to Dirofilaria spp., differentiated morphologically as D. repens. After surgery, the patient recovered completely. CONCLUSIONS: In most parts around the world, dirofilariasis is a rare and neglected infection. Nevertheless, the clinicians and pathologists must be informed about it.

Modulation of the inflammatory response after sclerotherapy for hydrocoele/spermatocoele.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the modulation of the inflammatory response after sclerotherapy for hydrocoele/spermatocoele. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with hydrocoele or spermatocoele presenting at the Department of Urology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden, from 2006 to 2012, were included in this prospective observational study of sclerotherapy for hydrocoele/spermatocoele using polidocanol as a sclerosing agent and adjuvant antibiotic and anti-inflammatory medication (AAAM) for modulation of the inflammatory response. Patients were clinically evaluated within 24-48 h after a complication or adverse event possibly related to sclerotherapy. Evaluation of cure was scheduled after 3 months and re-treatment, if necessary was carried out in the same manner as the first treatment. Groups of patients were compared using the chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: From a total of 191 patients, AAAM was given to 126, of whom 5% had subclinical epididymitis/swelling (SES) compared to 26% of the patients without AAAM (P < 0.001). No other complication was observed. The rate of cure for the whole group of patients was 93% after one or two treatments and significantly higher in the group with AAAM than in the group without AAAM (96% vs 88%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of the inflammatory response after sclerotherapy resulted in a lower incidence of SES and an increased cure rate.

Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma mimicking complicated epididymal cyst.

Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare nongerm cell intrascrotal malignant tumor in children and young adult/teens resulting from the mesenchymal tissues of the tunica vaginalis, epididymis, spermatic cord, and testis. RMS accounts for approximately 7% of all genitourinary tract RMSs and 12% of all pediatric scrotal neoplasms. Patients usually present with a painless unilateral scrotal mass. We report a 16-year-old boy with a paratesticular RMS mimicking epididymal cyst. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported in the literature presenting as an epididymal cyst.

Microsurgical Epididymal Cystectomy does not Impact Upon Sperm Count, Motility or Morphology and is a Safe and Effective Treatment for Epididymal Cystic Lesions (ECLs) in Young Men With Fertility Requirements.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of microsurgical epididymal cystectomy for the treatment of epididymal cystic lesions in young men with fertility requirements and the impact of this surgery upon sperm quality and epididymal function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the therapeutic outcomes, complications, safety and efficacy of microsurgical epididymal cystectomy and the impact of microsurgery upon sperm parameters. All patients were followed-up 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery to investigate sperm count, motility, morphology, neutral α-glucosidase, improvement of symptoms, recurrence, and complications. RESULTS: Palpated cyst pain was evident in 32 out of 51 patients. Pathologists identified 29 spermatoceles and 22 epididymal cysts. Mean operation time was 39.27 ± 5.98 minutes, and the mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 2.02 ± 0.35 days. After surgery, scrotal pain disappeared in 80.4% of patients (41/51). A significantly higher rate of pain disappearance was observed in patients with palpated pain than those without palpated pain. Insignificant difference was seen in terms of sperm count, motility, sperm morphology or neutral α-glucosidase between preoperation and postoperation at 1-year follow-up. Sperm count and NGA in patients with an epididymal cystic lesions > 2.5 cm were significantly increased after surgery. The rate of complications was 7.3%. No cyst recurrence was observed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical epididymal cystectomy does not impact upon sperm count, motility, morphology, or epididymal function and is a safe and effective surgical modality for young men with fertility requirements. Local palpated pain on the epididymal cyst is recommended as an optional surgical indication.